Back in the glory days of ACE Doubles, I always preferred the ACE Doubles that featured a single author. Many of these single-author ACE Doubles would have a novel on one side and a collection of short stories on the other. That was my favorite format. The Man With Nine Lives/A Touch of Infinity by Harlan Ellison (#D-413, 1960, $0.35) may have been the best (and most famous) of this type of ACE Double. In 1971, Ron Goulart’s ACE Double Clockwork’s Pirates and Ghost Breaker caught my attention. I’d read several of Goulart’s quirky SF novels and was delighted by this package, especially the nine short stories in Ghost Breaker. They have mystery elements that I enjoyed. I was reminded of Ron Goulart’s ACE Double by a fine review on Black Gate and was inspired to find my copy and reread it. Just click here to check it out.
GHOST BREAKER
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
- “Please Stand By” (January 1962, Fantasy & Science Fiction)
- “Uncle Arly” (July 1962, Fantasy & Science Fiction)
- “McNamara’s Fish” (July 1963, Fantasy & Science Fiction)
- “Kearny’s Last Case” (September 1965, Fantasy & Science Fiction)
- “Breakaway House” (May 1966, Fantasy & Science Fiction)
- “Fill in the Blank” (May 1967, Fantasy & Science Fiction)
- “The Ghost Patrol” (October 1968, Fantasy & Science Fiction)
- “The Strawhouse Pavillion” (January 1970, Coven 13)
- “Help Stamp Out Chesney” (1971, Ghost Breaker)
- OTHER MAX KEARNY STORIES:
- “The Return of Max Kearny” (December 1981, Fantasy & Science Fiction)
- “Hello from Hollywood” (December 1983, Fantasy & Science Fiction)
I have the Ellison double but not the Goulart – thanks George, let’s see how easy it is to find!
Sergio, I find ACE Doubles online at reasonable prices. Condition of the book is sometimes a problem.
My favorite story about ACE Doubles is that they would find a way to package anything. Someone said if ACE had to package the Bible, side one would be titled “It Came out of the Void” and side two would be “The Thing with Three Souls”.
Deb, love that joke! But I think the two titles on that Bible Double would be THE LIGHT BEYOND INFINITY and RETURN FROM BEYOND.
As often with fannish quotations, this one comes in many variations. Ace editor and joke originator Terry Carr is quoted by one of his old friends giving it this way:
‘And then there was Terry Carr’s version of the Bible as an Ace Double: “VENGEANCE OF THE DESERT GOD” bound with ‘THE THING WITH THREE BODIES.” ‘
Todd, I really like Carr’s titles!
I’m a fan of the Ace Doubles, as you know, and I also like Goulart’s work. This one is a lot of fun.
Bill, these ACE Doubles were a great value back in the day. Plenty to enjoy at a reasonable price.
Goulart’s SF books were always a must for me. I would read like them like other people would eat peanuts or potato chips. I was never disappointed.
Jerry, Goulart had the knack of keeping his stories fast-moving and fun.
Of course, the Kearney stories are fantasies, not sf at all.
I so loved the Max Kearney stories that GHOST–the complete collection of them for the longest time–was the reason I snapped up a reading copy of this one decades ago. Everyone else can have their Carnacki or Jules de Grandin…I was sticking with the wryly hilarious Kearney stories and MW Wellman’s John the Balladeer stories for my investigations of the paranormal. Ron Goulart, when I met him at the 2001 Bouchercon, was just a little weary of being asked for more Kearney, that character having been a close analog for himself in the early ’60s…my FFB of GB:
http://socialistjazz.blogspot.com/2010/05/fridays-forgotten-novella-and-bonus.html
Tpdd. thanks for the link! I wish there were more Max Kearney stories, too!
Good choice. I haven’t read these – obviously I will have to look for the collection – but I’ve read a number of Goulart’s books over the years, including both mystery and science fiction short stories.
Jeff, Goulart was a versatile writer. I enjoyed his mysteries, too.
I’ve seen them for $2-3 plus shipping, but as George said the condition is iffy.
I haven’t read either of these sides. My experience with Ace Doubles, and don’t get me wrong, I love them, is that often one side would be very good and the other much like the B side of a 45 record, just so-so. I often preferred to pay the money for the same number of pages in one good novel. I must have read some Goulart, but can’t think what or when. I’ll keep an eye out for this at Powell’s and Robert’s Books.
Black Gate has become a great website for reviews of SF-F stuff, hasn’t it? I look in nearly every day.
Rick, I’ve become a BLACK GATE addict, especially the posts of John O’Neill who focuses on classic SF and fantasy. I agree with your analysis of ACE Doubles. But the single author format usually delivered two good books.
However, he misses so much that’s 101-level…such as his review of Sturgeon’s A TOUCH OF STRANGE, which manages to not note the Doubleday first edition, or even the cover banner on one paperback edition that notes it’s the first unabridged reprint…
Great choice, George. My favorite Ace Double by one author was the Dean Koontz one – DARK OF THE WOODS w/ SOFT COME THE DRAGONS. It had a short novel and a collection of his early short stories plus a gorgeous Jeff Jones cover
It is possible that I’ve read a Goulart short story in a collection somewhere, but I don’t recall. Safer to say that I’ve not read his work. Something it looks like I need to remedy.
Fun covers!
Carl, Goulart is worth seeking out and reading. Both covers on this ACE Double were drawn by Karel Thole.
When Goulart’s humouros stories came out they were a rarity in a way – most SF was so “serious” …
In Germany we even had the expression SERCON = serious conservative, let’s take Heinlein’s early works as an example or later Larry Niven. Goulart was really refreshing, more in the tradition of Fred Pohl whom I also admire.
And of course ACE Doubles were a treat – I got many of them in London for less than a pound, those were the days …
PS:
SERCON was also applied to fans – you know those guys who would talk all day about intergalactic drives or five dimensional systems etc, discussing how realistic some novel’s settings werewhat Douglas Adams also spoofed …
Wolf, you are so right! Too much of SF and Fantasy is serious and humorless. Goulart’s work is a breath of fresh air in a stuffy genre.
“Sercon” was originally a North American fannish term, a portmanteau of “serious and constructive”, and made its way, clearly, to non-Anglophone fandom…sometimes used affectionately for noble projects such as Donald Day’s index to the fiction magazines, sometimes mockingly for the likes of Will Sykora’s attempt to “take over” US fandom (whatever that might mean). By the late ’60s, another heavily ironic meaning was added–if a fan wanted to invite another to go get stoned with him, the first might suggest the other go get sercon with him –thus a gosh-wowing tiresomely hyper-serious fan of Heinlein’s STARSHIP TROOPERS (some of whom would “grow up” to become Tea Puppies) and a pot-smoking casual fan of Heinlein’s STRANGER IN A STRANGE LAND could both be ironically sercon.
I see Rich Brown notes that Canadian fan Boyd Raeburn originated the term, and suggests the stone version actually didn’t arise till the late ’80s…I’ll buy that for a quarter:
http://www.fanac.org/Fannish_Reference_Works/Fan_terms/Fan_terms-08.html#010
http://fancyclopedia.wikidot.com/search:site/q/sercon
“Sercon” was originally a North American fannish term, a portmanteau of “serious and constructive”, and made its way, clearly, to non-Anglophone fandom…sometimes used affectionately for noble projects such as Donald Day’s index to the fiction magazines, sometimes mockingly for the likes of Will Sykora’s attempt to “take over” US fandom (whatever that might mean). By the late ’60s, another heavily ironic meaning was added–if a fan wanted to invite another to go get stoned with him, the first might suggest the other go get sercon with him –thus a gosh-wowing tiresomely hyper-serious fan of Heinlein’s STARSHIP TROOPERS (some of whom would “grow up” to become Tea Puppies) and a pot-smoking casual fan of Heinlein’s STRANGER IN A STRANGE LAND could both be ironically sercon.
I see Rich Brown notes that Canadian fan Boyd Raeburn originated the term, and suggests the stone version actually didn’t arise till the late ’80s…I’ll buy that for a quarter:
http://www.fanac.org/Fannish_Reference_Works/Fan_terms/Fan_terms-08.html#010
Todd, I was hoping you would weigh in on the Hugo Award fiasco. I think it’s despicable for a group of morons to hijack the Hugo Awards.
I think the Tea Puppies are pretty much as I suggest above, mostly superannuated 13yo-style fans of the duller sort of old ANALOG and/or Laser Books or just maybe Baen Books story who were angry at the perceived slighting of such work in the Hugo balloting. The other retrograde attitudes of the likes of “Vox Day” are even more sad, but apparently not shared by all the Tea Puppies, who attempted such bloc voting the previous year, but with less vim and with only one recommended slate (two similar ones this time). Relatively few people vote for the nominees, and not enough more for the awards…perhaps this might encourage more attention.
or, for slightly more data:
http://fancyclopedia.wikidot.com/search:site/q/sercon
Thanks, Todd, for that info!
The German Sercon fans were really boring – at lest for me so I didn’t become too active in fandom after I started work in 1969 – only went to two or three cons after leaving university.
Where should I look for info on the latest Hugos? George Martin hasn’t written anything on his blog during the last week …
Well. Wolf, the comments field here is still jumping….
http://www.thehugoawards.org/hugo-history/2015-hugo-awards/