THE ESSAYS, ARTICLES, AND REVIEWS OF EVELYN WAUGH

Despite being acknowledged as the most gifted stylist writing in the English Language, Evelyn Waugh ran out of money in the late 1950s. The royalties of his previous novels dwindled and Waugh was forced to find another source of income. That source was essays, articles, and reviews.

The Essays, Articles, and Reviews of Evelyn Waugh (1983) edited by Donat Gallagher runs 662 pages. About two-thirds of this collection deal with topics most contemporary readers would not be interested in. For example, how much do you want to read about Abyssinia, Marshal Tito, Waugh’s conservative Roman Catholic opinions? Too much of the articles, essays, and reviews in this volume wear plenty of dust.

I read The Essays, Articles, and Reviews of Evelyn Waugh because Michael Dirda recommended it. Dirda used to be the Book Editor for The Washington Post who I considered one of the top reviewers in the land. Reading The Essays, Articles, and Reviews of Evelyn Waugh wasn’t a complete loss. I came away with these gems:

“It may well be that in future generations Mr. Wodehouse’s public may shrink; the vast and grateful masses who now devour him…will turn onto other more topical entertaining, leaving him to survive as an epicures’ delight.” (p. 255)

“Messrs Graves’s and Hodge’s Handbook for Writers of English Prose has attracted more attention than is healthy, for there is little in it that we did not know at the age of 18. But we live in an unhealthy age. What Mr. Graves and Mr. Hodge and I learned at school is on longer considered the rudimentary equipment of an educated man.” (p. 275)

“There is no tradition of Titus Andronicus; only the established faith that it is unactable. …Its notorious horror repellent to gentler gyrations, seem drab today, conceding as they do plain butchery devoid of evil or pity. There is no plausible character, still less a liable one. There is no line of poetry, hardly a dozen lines of memorable rhetoric.” (p. 475)

…Consider the case of James Joyce. There was a writer possessed by style. His later work lost almost all faculty of communication, so intimate, allusive and idiosyncratic did it become, so obsessed by euphony and nuance. But because he was obscure and can only be read with intense intellectual effort–and therefore without easy pleasure–he is admitted in the academic canon.” (p. 478)

This should give you a sample of Evelyn Waugh’s writing and approach to reviews–the strongest and most relevant pieces in The Essays, Articles, and Reviews of Evelyn Waugh .

It you’re looking for a master stylist, this is the place to meet him. GRADE: A

12 thoughts on “THE ESSAYS, ARTICLES, AND REVIEWS OF EVELYN WAUGH”

    1. Todd Mason

      He was just laid off this year (and what does that say about THE WASHINGTON POST?)…you’ll still see his work around. I’m in sporadic correspondence with him.

      Reply ↓
      1. george Post author

        Todd, Dirda wrote a wonderful review of the PBS COUNT OF MONTE CRISTO for THE NEW YORK REVIEW OF BOOKS last Spring. Wonderful writer!

  1. Fred Blosser

    I read a bunch of Waugh several years ago, BRIDESHEAD, HANDFUL OF DUST, the three Sword of Honour novels. He still held up well as a novelist, an art less apt to age than essayist.

    Reply ↓
  2. Jeff Meyerson

    Interesting. Back in the ’70s and ’80s I read a lot of essay collections like this, many of them British, but not this. For various reasons I was not a fan of Waugh’s. But I have read a number of books by his older brother, Alec.

    Reply ↓
    1. george Post author

      Jeff, literary essays are a dying art form. Back in the day, I enjoyed Lionel Trilling, Evelyn Waugh, George Orwell, Susan Sontag, Joan Didion, Evan S. Connell, and many more.

      Reply ↓
  3. Beth Fedyn

    I’ve been a fan since I first read Decline and Fall in college. Strangely, Brideshead Revisited is probably my least favorite.
    My folks were big fans of The Loved One movie. I think they went to the theater to see it twice.

    Reply ↓

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *